se⋅cu⋅ri⋅ty /sɪˈkyʊərɪti/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [si-kyoor-i-tee]
–noun
1. freedom from danger, risk, etc.; safety.
2. freedom from care, anxiety, or doubt; well-founded confidence.
3. something that secures or makes safe; protection; defense.
4. freedom from financial cares or from want
The reading I did this morning was on being "secure in the love of the fellowship" and no longer being trapped in a downward spiral of obsession and compulsion. I have recently gone over my "fearless, moral inventory" of myself in regards to the area of my life that I suck at profoundly: relationships. In the process of that inventory, my "spiritual guide" made some notes with respect to my motivation in my relationships of being "safe and secure". Were my motives that bad in seeking those things? Or was I just "misinformed" as to what safety and security meant and how to obtain it? I have mused on this for a month now and am not sure I am any closer to "the answer"...
And yet, after reading the excerpt this morning, and viewing "secure" from a slightly different angle, I'm finding that once again, "the answer" is just as multi-faceted and ever changing as I am. I've had "security" of all types in all kinds of relationships. It's not been "financial security" I've sought, as I've given up all of my possessions in my two divorces and two other disastrous relationships; houses, cars, clothes, money. Just simply walked away, as it just really didn't matter to me what crap I owned or how much money I had in the bank. I've never even kept a wedding or engagement ring once it was over. Who the hell cares about a shiny bobble when your heart is shattered into more glittery pieces than diamonds in bright lights? It hasn't been "physical security" that I've lacked, as I can pretty much say that every man I've ever been with could probably do some pretty damn good ass kickin' if I were to be threatened with harm. They've protected and sometimes possessed me as I've allowed, and only one was ever physically harmful to me to the extent that my very life's security was in danger from them. No, it just hasn't been external safety that I seek.
The "security" I have relentlessly sought from another is that which can never be given. I want to be secure that the "other" will take care with me. Note that I did not say, take care OF me, but WITH me. The "security" that has elluded me over and over is that the "other" won't hurt my heart and abandon me in the middle of life. No one can guarantee me that. No ONE. And yet, there have been times where I was relatively close, and hurt and abandoned the other so they wouldn't/couldn't do it to me first. There's a guarantee!
"They" say that "happiness is an inside job". Well, if I look closely at the definitions of security, I think it's safe to say, for ME anyway, that "security is an inside job". The most important things to me have always been internal, so it seems this holds true here as well. That second definition: freedom from care, anxiety, or doubt; well-founded confidence. If I possess that "well-founded confindence", which ONLY comes from trial and error, trial and error, trial and success, THEN I will conversely possess freedom from care, anxiety, or doubt. What a conundrum life can be... Confidence is needed for security, yet failure is needed for confidence, in my case anyway. I'm not talkin' about confident I can solve a damn math problem either and ya know it!
Anyway, as you can see, Little Miss LifeMagnet is feeling a bit "polarized" these days, trying to define and refine security in self. I'll keep at it. Meanwhile, beware of gettin' too close to me! You're liable to be taken for quite the push/pull journey! :)